ISSN (print) 1995-2732
ISSN (online) 2412-9003

 

download PDF

DOI: 10.18503/1995-2732-2023-21-2-156-166

Abstract

A high quality and reliability of products largely depend on the quality of the materials and components used in their manufacturing. This is ensured, in turn, by the results of the claim settlement with suppliers of purchased products and buyers of finished products. That is why supplier relationship management and the claim procedure are one of the main components that ensure the quality of finished products. The paper discusses the claim procedure adopted at Kazan Helicopter Plant JSC. The object of the study is the claim procedure adopted at the enterprise, when manufacturing helicopters; the subject of the study is a process approach. In the course of the study, the authors identified the types of manufacturing defects and determined the number of identified non-conformities for every of them. It was concluded that the main difficulty of the enterprise was manufacturing defects in purchased components from suppliers. In the course of further research, the authors considered a supplier evaluation procedure and identified the main criteria set for them. To improve supplier relationship management, the authors used a process approach, whose application contributed to identifying “bottlenecks” and developing recommendations for reducing the volume of rejected products and manufacturing defects. The authors of the paper also noted that one of the significant shortcomings in the claim procedure was the lack of a methodology for assessing effectiveness of the claim settlement at the enterprise. In view of this, the paper contains the proposed approaches to its development. The paper conclusion presents main areas for improving the claim procedure and specific measures aimed at increasing consumer satisfaction. The recommendations set out in the paper will be useful to managers of enterprises in the engineering and other industries, as well as to people responsible for the claim settlement, and will improve the operation of enterprises in this important area.

Keywords

quality, claim, claim settlement, purchased components, supplier evaluation

For citation

Vakulenko E.Sh., Denisova Ya.V. Improving the Claim Procedure at a Machinery Manufacturing Plant. Vestnik Magnitogorskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta im. G.I. Nosova [Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University]. 2023, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 156-166. https://doi.org/10.18503/1995-2732-2023-21-2-156-166

Elmira Sh. Vakulenko – master’s student of the Department of Analytical Chemistry, Certification and Quality Management, Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, Russia. Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Yana V. Denisova – PhD (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Analytical Chemistry, Certification and Quality Management, Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, Russia. Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

1. State standard GOST RV 0015-703-2019. Sistema razrabotki i postanovki na proizvodstvo voennoy tekhniki. Poryadok predyavleniya i udovletvoreniya reklamatsiy. Osnovnye polozheniya [The system of development and launching into production of military vehicles. The procedure for filing and settling of claims. Main provisions]. Federal Agency on Technical Regulation and Metrology. Moscow: Standartinform, 2019. (In Russ.)

2. Marusov D.V. et al. Poryadok provedeniya rekla-matsionnoy raboty: ucheb. posobie [The claim procedure: study guide]. Saint Petersburg: Baltic State Technical University, 2019, 26 p. (In Russ.)

3. Company standard STO 617.110.131-2022. SMK. Vkhodnoy kontrol PKI. Poryadok provedeniya [QMS. Incoming control of purchased components. Procedure]. Kazan, 2022. (In Russ.)

4. Company standard STO 617.110.001-2018. SMK. Uchet braka v proizvodstve [QMS. Recording rejected products]. Kazan, 2018. (In Russ.)

5. Shetwan A.G., Vitanov V.I., Tjahjono B. Allocation of quality control stations in multistage manufacturing systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2017;60:473-484.

6. Company standard STO 617.110.241-2019. SMK. Upravlenie nesootvetstvuyushchey produktsiey. [QMS. Control of non-conforming products]. Kazan, 2019. (In Russ.)

7. Company standard STO 617.115.246-2021. SMK. Zakupki. Poryadok upravleniya [QMS. Procurement. Control procedure]. Kazan, 2021. (In Russ.)

8. Wenliang Chen, Zheng Wang. Integrated capacity planning and production control of an assembly manufacturing system. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2021;68(3):868-880.

9. Company standard STO 617.176.367-2020. SMK. Poryadok provedeniya audita predpriyatiy-postavshchikov (izgotoviteley) pokupnykh komplektuyushchikh izdeliy i materialov [QMS. The procedure for auditing suppliers (manufacturers) of purchased components and materials]. Kazan, 2020. (In Russ.)

10. What a process approach is and how to introduce it. Available at: https://blog.iteam.ru/chto-takoe-protsessnyj-podhod-i-kak-ego-vnedrit. (Accessed on December 05, 2022).

11. Kozlova D.Yu., Denisova Ya.V., Sopin V.F. Methodological approaches to developing an efficient incoming control and supply management system. Kontrol. Diagnostika [Control. Diagnostics]. 2021;24(7):42-49. (In Russ.)

12. Shkolina T.V., Izotikova E.Yu. Evaluation and improvement of the quality of the claim procedure. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Bryansk State Technical University]. 2017;(1(54)):254-260. (In Russ.)

13. State standard GOST 15467-79. Upravlenie kachestvom produktsii. Osnovnye ponyatiya. Terminy i opredeleniya [Product-quality control. Basic concepts. Terms and definitions]. State Committee of the USSR for Standards. Moscow: Standartinform, 2009. (In Russ.)

14. Denisova Ya.V., Kozlova D.Yu., Sopin V.F. Managing non-conformities at an enterprise using statistical methods. Vestnik tekhnologicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Technological University]. 2021; 24(2):93-97. (In Russ.)

15. Eusébio Nunes, Sérgio Sousa. A dynamic programming model for designing a quality control plan in a manufacturing process. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2019;38:581-588.